Peer Review Process

Implements a double-blind peer review policy, ensuring that the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential.

Each submission is assigned by the Chief Editor to a member of the Editorial Board, who selects two peer reviewers based on their expertise. The final decision is made based on the received reviews and communicated to the author along with reviewer comments.

Authors may be required to revise their manuscript, with a 2-week deadline for minor revisions and 1 month for major revisions. Extensions may be granted at the editor’s discretion. If the deadline is not met, the manuscript will be treated as a new submission and undergo a fresh review process.

When submitting a revised manuscript, authors must include a summary of changes. If the revisions are minor, the manuscript may be accepted without further review.

Manuscripts may be rejected for various reasons, including misalignment with the journal’s scope, not solely due to their quality.